Stalinism is used by Hoxhaists to self-identify, used by Trots as a pejorative for Marxist-Leninists, or can be used to refer to Stalin's policy in the soviet union (such as socialism in one country). "Stalinism" as an ideology is just Marxism-Leninism, which Stalin synthesized.

Libs and Trots wield the fear of Stalin as a club to silence Marxist-Leninists in public spaces by calling us "Stalinists."

Hoxhaists call themselfs stalinists

“The modern revisionists and reactionaries call us Stalinists, thinking that they insult us and, in fact, that is what they have in mind. But, on the contrary, they glorify us with this epithet; it is an honor for us to be Stalinists for while we maintain such a stand the enemy cannot and will never force us to our knees.”

– Enver Hoxha, Selected Works Vol. IV, pp. 234-235

Stalinism means whatever the person saying it wants it to mean. So next time someone says it either roll your eyes and ignore them (what I do) or ask them what they mean by it.

Usually it means that a person who venerates (or minimizes the negative aspects of) a period of Soviet history defined by a high degree of bureaucratization that discourages/ punishes democratic participation. For others it means wanting a police state maintained by violent purges and gulags for political enemies, in which regular people were afraid to speak out. For some both. For others it's just a thought-terminating epithet and they don't really know what it means but it's bad for reasons they've never had to explain like how most people have never had to explain why they think the Nazis were bad.

I will say I think saying something like "Stalinism isn't a thing Stalin was an ML" isn't really helpful. Like Reaganism isn't really a thing either, but it does convey a shorthand and that's how people communicate.

I don't think it's a useful category so I don't call myself a Stalinist but a lot of people in my org probably think I am one.

My dad called me one last week.

Comrade, these days even the Trotskyists are Stalinists

Stalinist is just another way to way marxist-leninist. So no, there is no meaningful stalinism in the west

Unless you're a freak like Grover Furr or part of a political faction that is acting in alliance with Stalin or Hoxha, no.

I told him I'm not even a communist, just a moderate social democrat who likes Soviet symbols for the shock value. (Not true, I'm a Marxist-Leninist, but gotta keep the peace with family, IYKYK.)

Why bother displaying Soviet symbols in a context where your dad can see them? You're just making yourself look like a 14 year old. You don't need a bunch of lifestyle merchandise to be a communist anyway. I say this because if the answer is, "I was at a communist rally," then why would a hamsic be the sticking point?

Its just Marxist Lenninism

Stalinism is when you really like food so you get a really big spoon so you can fit more food in your big fucking mouth like the big ol' slop-loving piggie you are

Really though, yes and no. Yes Stalinism is a term that could be used in a way that would be meaningful. Stalin was a world leader and he had actual policies, so you could refer to those policies and the philosophies behind them as Stalinism and that would make sense. But among people who know what they're talking about, that set of ideas is usually just called Marxism-Leninism, because that's what Stalin called them when he was actually doing them.

Usually when you hear the term Stalinism, it's from people who don't know what they're talking about and think Stalin was some kind of demon summoned from the underworld to do a genocide worse than the holocaust. So it's kind of a poisoned term at this point.

stalin was a hologram

Yes, and to know if a person is a Stalinist you just have to ask. If he spends the next 6 hours telling you he’s actually a Marxist-Leninist and not a Stalinist, he’s a Stalinist.

At one point, like the 1948-1953 range, yes, absolutely. Now the term has been heavily diluted, and most "stalinist" schools of thought have been subsumed by arachno-bidenism--specifically aligning with the jonkler tendency.

Yes it's when I show people a painting of comrade Stalin to see what the reaction is. But no, there are no significant groups of people who identity as a Stalinist.

There were definitely Stalin supporters when he was in power, but idk if they even called themselves Stalinists.

But I do wonder what does Wikipedia have to say about Stalinism?

Политическая система характеризуется:

- диктатурой (личной властью) Сталина;
- тоталитарным режимом (абсолютным контролем государства над всеми аспектами общественной и частной жизни)
- массовыми политическими репрессиями;
- сращиванием государственных органов и правящей коммунистической партии;
- цензурой
- пропагандой, культом личности Сталина, вождизмом и демонизацией врага;
- борьбой с религией в период 1929—1942 годов;
- фальсификацией истории;
- изоляционизмом в науке;
- борьбой с космополитизмом в период 1948—1953 годов.

Characteristics: 

- Dictatorship in accordance to Stalins rule.
- Totalitarianism regime. (Absolute control of the state, over every aspect of public end private life.)
- Political repressions on a grand scale.
- Having every part of the state departments serve the communist party's leadership. 
- Censorship
- Propaganda, Cult of personality, Leaderism and demonizing of the enemy. 
- Fight against religion from 1929 -1942. 
- Historical revisionism
- Scientific Isolationism 
- Fighting against cosmopolitanisms from 1948 - 1953 

looks down in the sources

The sources are bourgeoisie history books, so of course what's essentially slave owners will think you are the most evil person alive, that you are worse than Hitler, if you try to take it away from them. I'm hardly literate and even I know that much.

---

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT EQUATING STALINISM = MAOISM

It's kind of like Maoism I guess? Mao was not a Maoist, it's a concept that came after him.

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT EQUATING STALINISM = MAOISM

---

So ultimately it means what the last person told you it means. But in everyday spaces Stalinism is a manufactured concept, by Western powers, with the goal of demonizing USSR, to encourage anti-Soviet activity, to discredit their victory over the Nazis.

just a moderate social democrat who likes Soviet symbols

Yes, that is what Stalinism is (see for example KPRF, CPUSA, all of the Comintern immediately after WW2...)