Any headline that talks about “stunning”, “shocking”, or “angering” scientists gets an immediate red flag for me, right up there with “breakthrough” battery tech.
22
WadeTheWizard - 2.0yr
New battery tech shocks scientist after breakingthrough insulated casing.
13
carl_dungeon @lemmy.world - 2.0yr
🤯
4
niktemadur @lemmy.world - 2.0yr
Middle-aged men in white labcoats and with clipboard in hand, using the words "uncanny" and "eerie" in vague sentences.
4
blackbrook - 2.0yr
Yes, and it's particularly obnoxious when they seem to have twisted a quote as an excuse for this: '"This was absolutely stunning to watch first-hand," said materials scientist Brad Boyc.' I'm pretty sure that use of the word means "beautiful", not "shocking."
3
millie @beehaw.org - 2.0yr
This seems really cool, but my two main thoughts when I see something like this are: how badly are they misreporting this, and will anyone bother writing an article about the retraction a few months down the road when it turns out this was something completely different?
5
PixeIOrange @feddit.de - 2.0yr
"A possible explanation involves a process known as cold welding, which occurs under ambient temperatures whenever metal surfaces come close enough together for their respective atoms to tangle together."
Am i silly or where is the difference? Cold welding is known for a long time, nothing to be stunned about.
throws_lemy in physics
Cracked Piece of Metal Heals Itself in Experiment That Stuns Scientists
https://www.sciencealert.com/cracked-piece-of-metal-heals-itself-in-experiment-that-stuns-scientistsAny headline that talks about “stunning”, “shocking”, or “angering” scientists gets an immediate red flag for me, right up there with “breakthrough” battery tech.
New battery tech shocks scientist after breakingthrough insulated casing.
🤯
Middle-aged men in white labcoats and with clipboard in hand, using the words "uncanny" and "eerie" in vague sentences.
Yes, and it's particularly obnoxious when they seem to have twisted a quote as an excuse for this: '"This was absolutely stunning to watch first-hand," said materials scientist Brad Boyc.' I'm pretty sure that use of the word means "beautiful", not "shocking."
This seems really cool, but my two main thoughts when I see something like this are: how badly are they misreporting this, and will anyone bother writing an article about the retraction a few months down the road when it turns out this was something completely different?
"A possible explanation involves a process known as cold welding, which occurs under ambient temperatures whenever metal surfaces come close enough together for their respective atoms to tangle together."
Am i silly or where is the difference? Cold welding is known for a long time, nothing to be stunned about.