Just skimmed a few paragraphs, but the gist is that romantic partnerships are best when they obey the existing social/wealth hierarchy in arrangement, but are more difficult when they violate the tenets of capitalist ideology. This is likely somewhat true in the sense that class equivalents will have similar class interests that feeds into their perspectives. The summary is that cross-class relationships are dangerous to the status quo, and likely involve more good faith struggle to develop into long term stability.
Also the author definitely has a problematic perspective on all these topics and cites his own works as sources.
I think besides class analysis the fact he is using terms like superior and inferior as an Israeli shows there is a white supremacist and pro-eugenics undertones to the article.
Confidant6198 in comradeship
Can someone please make a class analysis of this article?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-the-name-of-love/202303/what-happens-when-people-date-out-of-their-leagueJust skimmed a few paragraphs, but the gist is that romantic partnerships are best when they obey the existing social/wealth hierarchy in arrangement, but are more difficult when they violate the tenets of capitalist ideology. This is likely somewhat true in the sense that class equivalents will have similar class interests that feeds into their perspectives. The summary is that cross-class relationships are dangerous to the status quo, and likely involve more good faith struggle to develop into long term stability.
Also the author definitely has a problematic perspective on all these topics and cites his own works as sources.
https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/4f58250b-86de-4793-a87d-9a298db1a537.png
I think besides class analysis the fact he is using terms like superior and inferior as an Israeli shows there is a white supremacist and pro-eugenics undertones to the article.