Who needs wheat anyway, amirite? What are we, peasants?
11
ComradeSasquatch - 2w
There is Quinoa and Amaranth.
5
Commiejones - 2w
Fake news. They are talking about acreage harvested. The measure of a harvest is not how much area you harvest it is how much tonnage you get. All things being equal yes more area means more wheat but all things are of course not equal. There have been significant advances in tonnage per acre in the last 150 years.
yes there will be less wheat but its not 150 years bad.
10
senseamidmadness - 2w
As usual, the US media can't resist stirring up panic.
yogthos in us_news
America’s wheat harvest set to fall to lowest level in 150 years
https://www.newsweek.com/americas-wheat-harvest-set-to-fall-to-lowest-level-in-150-years-12150306Who needs wheat anyway, amirite? What are we, peasants?
There is Quinoa and Amaranth.
Fake news. They are talking about acreage harvested. The measure of a harvest is not how much area you harvest it is how much tonnage you get. All things being equal yes more area means more wheat but all things are of course not equal. There have been significant advances in tonnage per acre in the last 150 years.
yes there will be less wheat but its not 150 years bad.
As usual, the US media can't resist stirring up panic.
awww the poor murican farmers need more subsidies