It feels Sisyphean to go through the language of these type of articles sometimes, but I still feel compelled to:
last year, adding that the startup tried to use Southeast Asian shell companies to illegally access advanced U.S. chips.
Per bullshit laws that the US had made up to try to slow China's AI progress.
This year, Anthropic said it identified a campaign by DeepSeek and two other Chinese AI labs to illicitly extract capabilities from its Claude AI platform to improve their own models, and OpenAI warned lawmakers that DeepSeek also was targeting its models.
This one is good for a laugh at least. As if gen AI isn't built on taking stuff without asking. Will never stop being funny to me, this one.
DeepSeek and CXMT could not be reached for comment outside normal business hours.
Is Reuters writing comedy now? They really couldn't wait 24 hours or just not include this totally normal thing.
When asked for comment, China's foreign ministry said the U.S. should cease "politicizing, instrumentalizing, and weaponizing" economic, trade and technological issues.
"China has consistently opposed the U.S.’s broad interpretation of the concept of national security and its abuse of export control measures, such as the Entity List, to contain and suppress Chinese enterprises," spokesperson Lin Jian said at a regular news briefing on Wednesday.
They could have just made this the whole article.
The United States and China are locked in a tense rivalry over technology, trade and national security, with Washington using tariffs and export controls to keep Beijing at bay while China maintains a stranglehold on rare earth minerals that defense, auto and chipmaking firms need.
Listen, Reuters, you just quoted China's foreign ministry on how they view this, as politicizing something that shouldn't be. Then you go bOth SiDeS.
"The Entity List is like whack-a-mole and you've got to keep whacking the moles," Luck said, referring to an arcade game.
Empire sees the fate of millions or billions as a game, not surprising at all.
Multiple Chinese companies were slated for the list for supplying Russian drones that were recovered in Poland last September, one of the people said. Listing those lesser-known companies is even more important to U.S. suppliers who may not know the nature of their business, the person said.
Do the writers get a pizza day if they manage to work in a line about Russia?
Since late 2025, Jeffrey Kessler, under secretary of commerce for industry and security, has sought to avoid listing Chinese parties for fear of escalating tensions between the U.S. and China, according to the first source and other people familiar with the matter.
What "consequences for your actions" does to an empire.
11
trashxeos - 1mon
Listen, Reuters, you just quoted China’s foreign ministry on how they view this, as politicizing something that shouldn’t be. Then you go bOth SiDeS.
They didn't even do it correctly either! The export controls the USA is using is so they can try to maintain monopoly rent over "AI" tech (even though China has been more than capable of making their own) instead of any humanitarian reasons. The export controls China is employing is to try and stop the minerals from being used to create weapons that the USA will drop on innocent people around the world without any legitimate reason (last time they joined in on any sort of legitimate use of weapons was WWII and that was only because they wanted to steal the credit out from under the Soviets). Arguably, China's goals with export controls are a net boon for the world population, where the export controls the USA is trying to enforce only benefit a fraction of a fraction of a percent of some of the worst humans to ever exist.
7
amemorablename - 1mon
Excellent point, well spotted.
6
trashxeos - 1mon
Of course, I make this point and then Inside China Business drops a timely video to drive the point home
3
TankieReplyBot - 1mon
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
yogthos in us_news
US holds off blacklisting China's DeepSeek, more than 100 firms deemed security risks, sources say
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/us-holds-off-blacklisting-chinas-deepseek-more-than-100-firms-deemed-security-2026-06-17/It feels Sisyphean to go through the language of these type of articles sometimes, but I still feel compelled to:
Per bullshit laws that the US had made up to try to slow China's AI progress.
This one is good for a laugh at least. As if gen AI isn't built on taking stuff without asking. Will never stop being funny to me, this one.
Is Reuters writing comedy now? They really couldn't wait 24 hours or just not include this totally normal thing.
They could have just made this the whole article.
Listen, Reuters, you just quoted China's foreign ministry on how they view this, as politicizing something that shouldn't be. Then you go bOth SiDeS.
Empire sees the fate of millions or billions as a game, not surprising at all.
Do the writers get a pizza day if they manage to work in a line about Russia?
What "consequences for your actions" does to an empire.
They didn't even do it correctly either! The export controls the USA is using is so they can try to maintain monopoly rent over "AI" tech (even though China has been more than capable of making their own) instead of any humanitarian reasons. The export controls China is employing is to try and stop the minerals from being used to create weapons that the USA will drop on innocent people around the world without any legitimate reason (last time they joined in on any sort of legitimate use of weapons was WWII and that was only because they wanted to steal the credit out from under the Soviets). Arguably, China's goals with export controls are a net boon for the world population, where the export controls the USA is trying to enforce only benefit a fraction of a fraction of a percent of some of the worst humans to ever exist.
Excellent point, well spotted.
Of course, I make this point and then Inside China Business drops a timely video to drive the point home
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: