50
2day
34

China has a hypersonic missile for under 100k, and there are F150 Ford trucks that are more expensive than that

https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/china-ykj-1000-low-cost-hypersonic-missile-indo-pacific-security-shift/
eldavi - 2day

yet, the F150's are considerably more destructive to the planet. lol

25
AntiOutsideAktion - 2day

this is what it looks like when your military procurement isn't centered around the profit motive

21
Greg Clarke - 2day

The missile probably has better range too

16
Sims - 1day

But at what cost ? ..no, wait.. never mind..

14
ashenone - 2day

But can you put a massive non functional lift kit on the missile?

12
partofthevoice @lemmy.zip - 16hr

Depends, are you China? Because if not, then probably not.

1
ShinkanTrain - 8hr

F150s will kill a lot more people though

8
FatVegan @leminal.space - 2day

Cool, two super pointless things that cost a lot of money.

4
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 2day

Not so pointless when the burger reich is surrounding you with military bases.

22
eleitl @lemmy.zip - 1day

I've read analysts who say that the price is unrealistically low. I think the same.

-4
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 1day

That's right, if one thing western analysts are famous for it's never being wrong about China's tech capabilities.

11
eleitl @lemmy.zip - 1day

It's economics. Materials and even the fuel used by hypersonics (as in maneuvrable high-Mach glide vehicle) have a certain price tag, even in China. 100 kUSD buys far too little of that, even in Russia and China.

-4
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 1day

wait until you learn about economies of scale and the benefits of controlling the entire supply chain

12
eleitl @lemmy.zip - 1day

Russia has that too, nevertheless Kinzhal and Kalibr (which are lower-Mach and don't carry a hypersonic glider stage) are both about 10 MUSD. Just the costs of JP-10/decilin are considerable already.

Depending on the specs, I'd assume the price to be a few MUSD, never under 100 kUSD.

-1
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 1day

Chinese industry and technical expertise absolutely dwarfs Russia

10
eleitl @lemmy.zip - 23hr

In hypersonics Russia currently has a lead over China. Obviously they're going to catch up rather soon.

0
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 23hr

Hypersonics cover a wide range of stuff, what this article discusses are cheap low end missiles as opposed to something like Oreshnik.

6
PolandIsAStateOfMind - 7hr

Even if it's 10 times more expensive it's still half to quarter price of Tomahawk missile.

3