The GrapheneOS developers are giving me concerns about the future of GrapheneOS
The drama and accusations the GrapheneOS developers are spewing and engaging in are giving me a bad taste in the mouth and make me doubt the OS’s reliability am I the only one?
upstroke4448 @lemmy.dbzer0.com - 3w
Not as bad a taste as the French government is giving me.
If its do I trust GOS or a confirmed pro chat control governments side of the story, its an easy choice.
87
artyom - 2w
There are many more sides than those 2. GOS is screaming about a new "harrassment" campaign every week.
9
pdxfed @lemmy.world - 2w
Knowing nothing of the situations details, when you're a thorn in the side of the most powerful interests on the planet,it seems reasonable that a small group would face deliberate, concentrated pressure from business to legal and the state and any other mechanism. That's generally what power does, assuming the little guy isn't subsumed.
What is the evidence of foul play by GOS, or why would they not have a pretty extreme bias of support?
12
PiraHxCx - 2w
I think everyone would love some evidence here, but so far it was one journalist from one newspaper talking to one cop that said criminals are using GrapheneOS because it destroys evidence. Afaik Daniel didn't post any notification, inquiry or general communication he received from any government official or agency...
7
artyom - 2w
from business to legal and the state and any other mechanism.
I'm not referring to any of those "mechanisms", I'm referring to basically the entirety of the privacy/security/sovereign communities. They disparage other Android "privacy" platforms and communities on a regular basis, then claim to be victims of "targeted attacks" from those communities. Louis Rossman and Techlore are also 2 people who have also been accused of "harassment" without evidence. Just for starters.
2
upstroke4448 @lemmy.dbzer0.com - 2w
Their past dramas are irrelevant to this issue.
Giving into a straw man argument such as their other dramas somehow devalue what's going on now, only plays into the French propaganda campaign.
0
artyom - 2w
They're not irrelevant, they're both symptoms of the same problem. The Developer Who Cried Wolf.
1
limer - 3w
I would prefer my privacy software to be developed by people like this, rather than people who are calm and flexible
55
paper_moon @lemmy.world - 3w
Its all fine until their approach of privacy or security differs with what's best for the project, then there's no reasoning with them to fix it because they're not calm and flexible. Then ya gotta fork it and get everyone to transition to the new fork, and get developers back onboard, etc.
A crazy, but pointed example of something like this could be: the dude could just claim grapheneos going forward will not have networking anymore because thats an attack vector, and at that point the project doesn't even suite anyone's needs to be used as a smartphone anymore. How are you gonna reason with someone like this that, while keeping networking in the project is an attack vector, its necessary to be able to use the project for it's intended use case? You probably aren't
30
PiraHxCx - 3w
The guy being paranoid asshole is passable, what I thought a really shit move is calling the community to create alt accs to harass people from other projects and saying he will ban anyone that complains. The Rossmann video is quite shocking, you see the dev's complete disassociation with reality... yeah the code is open, but how many people outside the project are really auditing it? Even people inside the project, are they auditing each others' work? If the guy doesn't get treatment, how long until he decides his own userbase is after him?
16
ganymede - 3w
admittedly i'm not up to date on all the drama, but i thought that graphene saw themselves as victims of alt attacks?
7
PiraHxCx - 3w
So yeah, it seems like he accuses everyone of persecuting and harassing him, but in those videos there are several examples of what he considers persecuting and harassing. Both channels were highly supportive of the project and actively promoted it, but because they would also promote other projects and do benchmark tests, they were "spreading misinformation", "being biased", "campaigning against him" and so on. And in the second video he accused the guy of campaigning against him just for saying "This is informative, and unfortunate" about the first video lol. So him being a "victim" is just his lack of proper medication, because anyone who asked him about such attacks, if he had prints or so, was also accused of attacking him lol
Undoubtly GrapheneOS is the best project out there, so yeah, this is unfortunate.
16
Supervisor194 @lemmy.world - 2w
Strange, I put the same link in one of my comments and a mod removed it.
1
JamesBoeing737MAX @sopuli.xyz - 2w
Yes, the minority is harassing the majority. Hmm, very logical.
0
PiraHxCx - 2w
Very documented.
edit: removing the rest of the message because it was a misunderstanding.
1
twisty3060 - 2w
@PiraHxCx@JamesBoeing737MAX
Pls link the x post you mentioned before wrongly referencing me as a Gos fake account
1
PiraHxCx - 2w
Sorry, as the acc had no previous interaction with anything but that post I assumed it was a disposable acc. The screenshot of that comment is in the very same article, but you can also check it here https://nitter.net/GrapheneOS/status/1991610031478042948#m (nitter frontend link)
2
twisty3060 - 2w
@PiraHxCx
I didn't know they made such claim. I don't think there's any evidence indicating eOS has French government backdoors.
2
PiraHxCx - 2w
Sorry again about referencing you as a fake acc, there is a screenshot I'm hunting now about a call to users to create disposable accs to respond to social media posts that will give a better context for my assumption, but I removed the whole content of that previous post anyway.
1
N.E.P.T.R - 3w
While I do find GOS drama a bit annoying, they aren't wrong about the lacking security of many AOSP forks. iode and /e/OS have a history late patches for security vulnerabilities in both the OS (https://web.archive.org/web/20241231003546/https://divestos.org/pages/patch_history) and for the forked apps they bundle with it. Each Android monthly and Chromium patches usually contains dozens High Risk CVEs, so taking a month or 2 is unacceptable. Neither are good for privacy or security.
I understand security implications but I'll be getting Fairphone 6 with /e/OS over Pixel with GrapheneOS. For me FOSS ranks higher than HW security features, and buying Google device goes against FOSS principles.
5
FG_3479 @lemmy.world - 2w
Buying a used Pixel lets you use the hardware without funding Google.
9
pdxfed @lemmy.world - 2w
*Directly funding Google. You are certainly participating in a secondary market for their product you purchase used.
7
Scirocco @lemmy.world - 2w
Not being familiar with the controveries referenced in this thread....
All of this reminds me very much of OpenBSD and Theo de Radt (?) back in the 98-02 era.
OpenBSD is certainly not the most popular *nix today, but it's probably the most secure.
1
PrivacyDingus - 2w
Two things can simultaneously be true, Daniel can be an individual who engages in very problematic behaviours and GrapheneOS can still be the most-secure and reliable OS out there.
51
jherazob @beehaw.org - 2w
Basically this. The project head might be a bit too paranoid, bellicose and problematic, but at this time a phone with GrapheneOS seems to be by far the safest way to have a smartphone, and the project head's personality might be a part on this as their stated objective is to be able to resist state-level actors, you likely need someone who's more than a bit "out there" to have the right mind for this
16
Scirocco @lemmy.world - 2w
Can we get a tldr of the "problematic behaviours"?
As a casual who bought a pixel 9 specifically for Graphene, I not too embedded in the culture/dramas, and surely many others reading here are similarly unfamiliar
5
Kilgore Trout - 2w
His «problematic behaviour» is simply callingäoutäthings for what they are, with no soft wording.
4
majster @lemmy.zip - 2w
Its nutjobs like them that are pushing progress further. State security apparatus doesn't want to work by law. That can be observed worldwide.
French went after Telegram even though it doesn't market itself primarily for security. It was just that some public channels went against their strategic objectives and they felt the need to bruteforce their way.
So GrapheneOS is very right to be nervous and pack their bags before they come knocking at the door.
43
FG_3479 @lemmy.world - 2w
They literally said that French police are being told to treat Pixel phones as suspicious, which if true, shows why they're concerned.
18
leftascenter @jlai.lu - 2w
Having a secure phone / secure messaging has been seen as suspicious by the police in france for several years now.
This has already been used against eco activists to detain them preemptively and a few times to increase charges towards terrorism / organized crime when possible.
10
Catalyst - 2w
They're being threatened by the entire French government. Its not drama. This is a very real situation.
41
leftascenter @jlai.lu - 2w
All secured OSes and messaging systems are threatened by European governments / EU institutions at the moment, and the French government has been doing so for a few years.
This is not a grapheneOS only issue and it is not new.
8
Jakeroxs @sh.itjust.works - 2w
I don't think it's in any way limited to the EU lol
5
leftascenter @jlai.lu - 2w
Being French, I am not knowledgeable enough beyond Europe 😁.
For context, Germany recently did a last minute blockage of a European move towards mass surveillance of messaging (called chat control), and a v2 is already being prepared for another attack on privacy at European level.
We are living in interesting times.
3
sheinar - 3w
I've accepted for a while that the lead developer is extremely paranoid and could probably genuinely do with healthcare intervention. Like in much open source development I think it isn't helped by overwork and burnout, so I hope that at some point Graphene gets a better governance structure which spreads responsibility and which hopefully will limit the incessant drama that only harms the project. I don't see him being willing to give up his grip, but I can always hope.
I'll continue to use Graphene unless things go entirely off the rails though, as it is a great OS and I don't really think there are many great alternatives.
38
RodgeGrabTheCat 🇨🇦🏴☠️ - 3w
Such drama has been going on for years. I wouldn't read too much into it.
33
daniskarma @lemmy.dbzer0.com - 2w
I wouldn't trust a sane person to do a ultra private phone OS.
You need the paranoia, you need to see the shadows move to do it right.
29
CoyoteFacts - 3w
It mainly makes me pine for linux phones. I think Graphene is the best we have at the moment in the mobile space, but that's far more of a testament to our lack of options than how valuable Graphene is. I have no doubts that we'll eventually kick Graphene to the curb when it stops being useful, so I'm not overly concerned with its future. Worst-case, I think many of us would be just fine on any other AOSP rom for a few extra years until linux phones can come save us all.
22
kkj @lemmy.dbzer0.com - 3w
pine for linux phones
I see what you did there.
14
sobchak @programming.dev - 3w
I could be wrong, but I think Linux would be horrible for the kind of security you'd want in a smartphone. At least that's what I read from the GrapheneOS folks...
-2
gtr @programming.dev - 2w
Depends on what your threat model is. Sure a fully locked down mobile OS is more secure, but I also care about freedom and privacy. It's not all black and white.
6
CoyoteFacts - 3w
As far as I'm aware this is true (same with a lot of desktop linux distros), but I'm more interested in freeing myself from Android at the moment. I'm sure we can get there eventually w/r/t security, but it takes time, and we'll never get there if we don't start moving.
5
l3db3tt3r - 3w
Who benefits?
Who benefits from sowing a narrative around "drama", "accusation", and/or "paranoia". Seriously.
I think given the following circumspect; GrapheneOS's reaction, to move project pieces out of potential hostile environments/jurisdiction, is perfectly reasonable.
France's Support for EU “Chat Control”, scanning proposals. France has been one of the governments most supportive of EU‑level proposals that would require scanning of communications and devices for illegal content.
The general French framing and approach to cybercrime. As in other EU countries, French authorities are pushing for: Expanded powers to compel cooperation from service providers, and developers. Strong rhetoric against tools that are seen as systematically obstructing investigations.
20
exu - 2w
The main GrapheneOS dev creates beef with a bunch of other projects. It's not some shadowy organisation, it's him having stupid takes in GitHub issues and spreading false claims about other projects.
3
warm - 3w
GrapheneOS has always had a massive PR problem and crazy leadership unfortunately.
19
pdxfed @lemmy.world - 2w
Unlike say Google? Why is there an expectation that a group working completely against some of the most powerful actors on the planet, openly, against the grain of mainstream society often and having to bear that responsibility would be charming, at ease?
I cannot even begin to imagine the mental stress from constantly having to think ahead, in a global David and Goliath, in a maze designed to get you to give up. I probably have half the issues the GOS team does and I can't claim it's for doing anything on the scale of what they are.
1
warm - 2w
You are mistaking what I am saying. I have nothing against the project as whole and the mission is fantastic.
They just have zero PR skills, don't know when to keep their mouth shut or how to communicate properly when they need to. A little bit of consultation would go a long way for them. Obviously I am not expecting Google levels of PR/marketing, but it's not great to see just ranting Discord/matrix messages. If it wasn't an issue, these posts wouldn't exist at all.
2
FauxLiving @lemmy.world - 3w
Unless there’s drama in my updates I don’t particularly care too much about drama.
14
SomeAmateur - 3w
The drama can be so minor too
"How can he run our department when his favorite color is INDIGO!? I can't BELIEVE that guy!"
4
T (they/she) - 2w
Could you post what you are talking about to give some context?
11
Matt - 2w
I don't care about the community, I just care about the experience of using it.
10
azuth - 2w
In my opinion both the evident ego of of the project lead as well as his naivety (tethering the project to Google) are huge red flags despite any assumed technical superiority.
9
FG_3479 @lemmy.world - 2w
They chose Google because they are the only major OEM to allow you to relock the bootloader after installing a custom ROM. Samsung, Motarola, Huawei, Xiaomi etc all don't.
10
communism - 2w
In addition to this, they are working with an OEM to produce their own Graphene phones. It sounds like they've made significant progress on that front so I'm hopeful.
3
timbuck2themoon @sh.itjust.works - 2w
Pretty sure calyx relocks the bootloader on moto phones.
1
TheOneCurly - 2w
They're literally working with a manufacturer to make non-google phones. Tethered to google is a wild mischaracterization.
7
azuth - 2w
No it's not. This is a recent development that has not yet actually come to fruition. It may exist in 2026.
Before that GrapheneOS dismissed any idea of targeting other phones than the ones build by one of the most anti-privacy companies on earth, that seeks to consolidate control of Android.
5
NewOldGuard - 2w
This isn’t true, they’ve supported other devices in the past. They’ve been Pixel-focused for the security features that other manufacturers haven’t offered
6
azuth - 2w
Yes, before Google made phone on it's own they supported some Nexus devices (google-partnered) and the Samsung Galaxy S4.
4
erebion - 2w
I also feel concerned about GrapheneOS. Here's why.
I got banned from the GrapheneOS Matrix chat simply for asking a question, it was worded similar to this:
"Hey there! GrapheneOS is cool. I noticed CalyxOS added support for eSIM, are you planning to add that as well?"
The post got deleted, I thought I had not sent it and posted it again. It was deleted again. I asked something along the lines of "Wait, where has my question regading eSIM support and doing the same as CalyxOS gone? Seems to have disappeared, lol".
THAT was also deleted.
Then I posted something along the lines of "Huh, my questions seem to be disappearing".
That was NOT deleted.
Then I asked something like "Anyway, are there plans to add eSIM support just like CalyxOS? :)".
That was ALSO deleted.
I got a private message from a mod saying I was banned.
That was alle the interaction I ever had with the GrapheneOS project. I might have started contributing, but I could not even ask a simple question. It seems that they don't like it if you mention any other custom ROM, I guess.
(This has been a while ago, so I don't remember my precise wording)
9
Jay🚩 - 2w
Which channel on Matrix ? They seems to have many ones so mods in general if questions get asked in wrong channels ban which is weird I would expect them to reply that go to #relevant room and ask there
1
erebion - 2w
I'm pretty sure it was a general GrapheneOS room, but as said it's been a while, so idk.
At least asking the question did not seem wrong.
1
Kilgore Trout - 2w
It seems you were rightfully banned.
-3
Truscape - 3w
The source code's just as transparent, and the fundamental concepts and implementations aren't going to vanish at all. If we get a future CarbonOS, so be it, but I doubt that will be in any near future scenario.
6
Auli @lemmy.ca - 3w
Why is it transparent? Cause its open source. Yes there has never been anything a bug or backdoor in open source code before ever.
-3
artyom - 2w
Bing transparent is not the same thing as being secure. The difference is that closed source code can be audited by no one except its' developers, and open source code can be audited by anyone.
5
exu - 2w
You're not the only one. It's one of my biggest reasons for staying away from it
6
12plus1plus12 @midwest.social - 2w
What do you use instead?
2
exu - 2w
LineageOS with microg
-1
ganymede - 3w
some of it is kind of inevitable when you see how far ahead from everyone else they are technically and when people shitting on their work just aren't at their (technical) level it seems to be very draining. and eventually lead to dramas.
6
VampirePenguin @lemmy.world - 2w
GOS is a great project. This is a FUD campaign.
4
nullptr - 3w
i might just fork grapheneos and rewrite everything.
3
ABetterTomorrow @sh.itjust.works - 2w
Too be fair (not French but aware of their culture and government) the French are pretty smart, for people and don’t fuck around with serious issues. I bet you if they got access, it wouldn’t be long till issue a long warning before a ban if it were to cause harm to others.
1
Libb - 2w
The main reason why I decided not to use it, despite it being an obvious choice. But I'm also that kind of old dude that is not very receptive to drama... this may explain ;)
12plus1plus12 in privacy
The GrapheneOS developers are giving me concerns about the future of GrapheneOS
The drama and accusations the GrapheneOS developers are spewing and engaging in are giving me a bad taste in the mouth and make me doubt the OS’s reliability am I the only one?
Not as bad a taste as the French government is giving me.
If its do I trust GOS or a confirmed pro chat control governments side of the story, its an easy choice.
There are many more sides than those 2. GOS is screaming about a new "harrassment" campaign every week.
Knowing nothing of the situations details, when you're a thorn in the side of the most powerful interests on the planet,it seems reasonable that a small group would face deliberate, concentrated pressure from business to legal and the state and any other mechanism. That's generally what power does, assuming the little guy isn't subsumed.
What is the evidence of foul play by GOS, or why would they not have a pretty extreme bias of support?
I think everyone would love some evidence here, but so far it was one journalist from one newspaper talking to one cop that said criminals are using GrapheneOS because it destroys evidence. Afaik Daniel didn't post any notification, inquiry or general communication he received from any government official or agency...
I'm not referring to any of those "mechanisms", I'm referring to basically the entirety of the privacy/security/sovereign communities. They disparage other Android "privacy" platforms and communities on a regular basis, then claim to be victims of "targeted attacks" from those communities. Louis Rossman and Techlore are also 2 people who have also been accused of "harassment" without evidence. Just for starters.
Their past dramas are irrelevant to this issue.
Giving into a straw man argument such as their other dramas somehow devalue what's going on now, only plays into the French propaganda campaign.
They're not irrelevant, they're both symptoms of the same problem. The Developer Who Cried Wolf.
I would prefer my privacy software to be developed by people like this, rather than people who are calm and flexible
Its all fine until their approach of privacy or security differs with what's best for the project, then there's no reasoning with them to fix it because they're not calm and flexible. Then ya gotta fork it and get everyone to transition to the new fork, and get developers back onboard, etc.
A crazy, but pointed example of something like this could be: the dude could just claim grapheneos going forward will not have networking anymore because thats an attack vector, and at that point the project doesn't even suite anyone's needs to be used as a smartphone anymore. How are you gonna reason with someone like this that, while keeping networking in the project is an attack vector, its necessary to be able to use the project for it's intended use case? You probably aren't
The guy being paranoid asshole is passable, what I thought a really shit move is calling the community to create alt accs to harass people from other projects and saying he will ban anyone that complains. The Rossmann video is quite shocking, you see the dev's complete disassociation with reality... yeah the code is open, but how many people outside the project are really auditing it? Even people inside the project, are they auditing each others' work? If the guy doesn't get treatment, how long until he decides his own userbase is after him?
admittedly i'm not up to date on all the drama, but i thought that graphene saw themselves as victims of alt attacks?
So yeah, it seems like he accuses everyone of persecuting and harassing him, but in those videos there are several examples of what he considers persecuting and harassing. Both channels were highly supportive of the project and actively promoted it, but because they would also promote other projects and do benchmark tests, they were "spreading misinformation", "being biased", "campaigning against him" and so on. And in the second video he accused the guy of campaigning against him just for saying "This is informative, and unfortunate" about the first video lol. So him being a "victim" is just his lack of proper medication, because anyone who asked him about such attacks, if he had prints or so, was also accused of attacking him lol
https://youtu.be/Dx7CZ-2Bajg
https://youtu.be/4To-F6W1NT0
Undoubtly GrapheneOS is the best project out there, so yeah, this is unfortunate.
Strange, I put the same link in one of my comments and a mod removed it.
Yes, the minority is harassing the majority. Hmm, very logical.
Very documented.
edit: removing the rest of the message because it was a misunderstanding.
@PiraHxCx @JamesBoeing737MAX
Pls link the x post you mentioned before wrongly referencing me as a Gos fake account
Sorry, as the acc had no previous interaction with anything but that post I assumed it was a disposable acc. The screenshot of that comment is in the very same article, but you can also check it here https://nitter.net/GrapheneOS/status/1991610031478042948#m (nitter frontend link)
@PiraHxCx
I didn't know they made such claim. I don't think there's any evidence indicating eOS has French government backdoors.
Sorry again about referencing you as a fake acc, there is a screenshot I'm hunting now about a call to users to create disposable accs to respond to social media posts that will give a better context for my assumption, but I removed the whole content of that previous post anyway.
While I do find GOS drama a bit annoying, they aren't wrong about the lacking security of many AOSP forks. iode and /e/OS have a history late patches for security vulnerabilities in both the OS (https://web.archive.org/web/20241231003546/https://divestos.org/pages/patch_history) and for the forked apps they bundle with it. Each Android monthly and Chromium patches usually contains dozens High Risk CVEs, so taking a month or 2 is unacceptable. Neither are good for privacy or security.
See a comparison between some Android ROMs here, especially noting the update speed section: https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
I understand security implications but I'll be getting Fairphone 6 with /e/OS over Pixel with GrapheneOS. For me FOSS ranks higher than HW security features, and buying Google device goes against FOSS principles.
Buying a used Pixel lets you use the hardware without funding Google.
*Directly funding Google. You are certainly participating in a secondary market for their product you purchase used.
Not being familiar with the controveries referenced in this thread....
All of this reminds me very much of OpenBSD and Theo de Radt (?) back in the 98-02 era.
OpenBSD is certainly not the most popular *nix today, but it's probably the most secure.
Two things can simultaneously be true, Daniel can be an individual who engages in very problematic behaviours and GrapheneOS can still be the most-secure and reliable OS out there.
Basically this. The project head might be a bit too paranoid, bellicose and problematic, but at this time a phone with GrapheneOS seems to be by far the safest way to have a smartphone, and the project head's personality might be a part on this as their stated objective is to be able to resist state-level actors, you likely need someone who's more than a bit "out there" to have the right mind for this
Can we get a tldr of the "problematic behaviours"?
As a casual who bought a pixel 9 specifically for Graphene, I not too embedded in the culture/dramas, and surely many others reading here are similarly unfamiliar
His «problematic behaviour» is simply callingäoutäthings for what they are, with no soft wording.
Its nutjobs like them that are pushing progress further. State security apparatus doesn't want to work by law. That can be observed worldwide.
French went after Telegram even though it doesn't market itself primarily for security. It was just that some public channels went against their strategic objectives and they felt the need to bruteforce their way.
So GrapheneOS is very right to be nervous and pack their bags before they come knocking at the door.
They literally said that French police are being told to treat Pixel phones as suspicious, which if true, shows why they're concerned.
Having a secure phone / secure messaging has been seen as suspicious by the police in france for several years now.
This has already been used against eco activists to detain them preemptively and a few times to increase charges towards terrorism / organized crime when possible.
They're being threatened by the entire French government. Its not drama. This is a very real situation.
All secured OSes and messaging systems are threatened by European governments / EU institutions at the moment, and the French government has been doing so for a few years.
This is not a grapheneOS only issue and it is not new.
I don't think it's in any way limited to the EU lol
Being French, I am not knowledgeable enough beyond Europe 😁.
For context, Germany recently did a last minute blockage of a European move towards mass surveillance of messaging (called chat control), and a v2 is already being prepared for another attack on privacy at European level.
We are living in interesting times.
I've accepted for a while that the lead developer is extremely paranoid and could probably genuinely do with healthcare intervention. Like in much open source development I think it isn't helped by overwork and burnout, so I hope that at some point Graphene gets a better governance structure which spreads responsibility and which hopefully will limit the incessant drama that only harms the project. I don't see him being willing to give up his grip, but I can always hope.
I'll continue to use Graphene unless things go entirely off the rails though, as it is a great OS and I don't really think there are many great alternatives.
Such drama has been going on for years. I wouldn't read too much into it.
I wouldn't trust a sane person to do a ultra private phone OS.
You need the paranoia, you need to see the shadows move to do it right.
It mainly makes me pine for linux phones. I think Graphene is the best we have at the moment in the mobile space, but that's far more of a testament to our lack of options than how valuable Graphene is. I have no doubts that we'll eventually kick Graphene to the curb when it stops being useful, so I'm not overly concerned with its future. Worst-case, I think many of us would be just fine on any other AOSP rom for a few extra years until linux phones can come save us all.
I see what you did there.
I could be wrong, but I think Linux would be horrible for the kind of security you'd want in a smartphone. At least that's what I read from the GrapheneOS folks...
Depends on what your threat model is. Sure a fully locked down mobile OS is more secure, but I also care about freedom and privacy. It's not all black and white.
As far as I'm aware this is true (same with a lot of desktop linux distros), but I'm more interested in freeing myself from Android at the moment. I'm sure we can get there eventually w/r/t security, but it takes time, and we'll never get there if we don't start moving.
Who benefits?
Who benefits from sowing a narrative around "drama", "accusation", and/or "paranoia". Seriously.
I think given the following circumspect; GrapheneOS's reaction, to move project pieces out of potential hostile environments/jurisdiction, is perfectly reasonable.
France's Support for EU “Chat Control”, scanning proposals. France has been one of the governments most supportive of EU‑level proposals that would require scanning of communications and devices for illegal content.
The general French framing and approach to cybercrime. As in other EU countries, French authorities are pushing for: Expanded powers to compel cooperation from service providers, and developers. Strong rhetoric against tools that are seen as systematically obstructing investigations.
The main GrapheneOS dev creates beef with a bunch of other projects. It's not some shadowy organisation, it's him having stupid takes in GitHub issues and spreading false claims about other projects.
GrapheneOS has always had a massive PR problem and crazy leadership unfortunately.
Unlike say Google? Why is there an expectation that a group working completely against some of the most powerful actors on the planet, openly, against the grain of mainstream society often and having to bear that responsibility would be charming, at ease?
I cannot even begin to imagine the mental stress from constantly having to think ahead, in a global David and Goliath, in a maze designed to get you to give up. I probably have half the issues the GOS team does and I can't claim it's for doing anything on the scale of what they are.
You are mistaking what I am saying. I have nothing against the project as whole and the mission is fantastic.
They just have zero PR skills, don't know when to keep their mouth shut or how to communicate properly when they need to. A little bit of consultation would go a long way for them. Obviously I am not expecting Google levels of PR/marketing, but it's not great to see just ranting Discord/matrix messages. If it wasn't an issue, these posts wouldn't exist at all.
Unless there’s drama in my updates I don’t particularly care too much about drama.
The drama can be so minor too
"How can he run our department when his favorite color is INDIGO!? I can't BELIEVE that guy!"
Could you post what you are talking about to give some context?
I don't care about the community, I just care about the experience of using it.
In my opinion both the evident ego of of the project lead as well as his naivety (tethering the project to Google) are huge red flags despite any assumed technical superiority.
They chose Google because they are the only major OEM to allow you to relock the bootloader after installing a custom ROM. Samsung, Motarola, Huawei, Xiaomi etc all don't.
In addition to this, they are working with an OEM to produce their own Graphene phones. It sounds like they've made significant progress on that front so I'm hopeful.
Pretty sure calyx relocks the bootloader on moto phones.
They're literally working with a manufacturer to make non-google phones. Tethered to google is a wild mischaracterization.
No it's not. This is a recent development that has not yet actually come to fruition. It may exist in 2026.
Before that GrapheneOS dismissed any idea of targeting other phones than the ones build by one of the most anti-privacy companies on earth, that seeks to consolidate control of Android.
This isn’t true, they’ve supported other devices in the past. They’ve been Pixel-focused for the security features that other manufacturers haven’t offered
Yes, before Google made phone on it's own they supported some Nexus devices (google-partnered) and the Samsung Galaxy S4.
I also feel concerned about GrapheneOS. Here's why.
I got banned from the GrapheneOS Matrix chat simply for asking a question, it was worded similar to this:
"Hey there! GrapheneOS is cool. I noticed CalyxOS added support for eSIM, are you planning to add that as well?"
The post got deleted, I thought I had not sent it and posted it again. It was deleted again. I asked something along the lines of "Wait, where has my question regading eSIM support and doing the same as CalyxOS gone? Seems to have disappeared, lol".
THAT was also deleted.
Then I posted something along the lines of "Huh, my questions seem to be disappearing".
That was NOT deleted.
Then I asked something like "Anyway, are there plans to add eSIM support just like CalyxOS? :)".
That was ALSO deleted.
I got a private message from a mod saying I was banned.
That was alle the interaction I ever had with the GrapheneOS project. I might have started contributing, but I could not even ask a simple question. It seems that they don't like it if you mention any other custom ROM, I guess.
(This has been a while ago, so I don't remember my precise wording)
Which channel on Matrix ? They seems to have many ones so mods in general if questions get asked in wrong channels ban which is weird I would expect them to reply that go to #relevant room and ask there
I'm pretty sure it was a general GrapheneOS room, but as said it's been a while, so idk.
At least asking the question did not seem wrong.
It seems you were rightfully banned.
The source code's just as transparent, and the fundamental concepts and implementations aren't going to vanish at all. If we get a future CarbonOS, so be it, but I doubt that will be in any near future scenario.
Why is it transparent? Cause its open source. Yes there has never been anything a bug or backdoor in open source code before ever.
Bing transparent is not the same thing as being secure. The difference is that closed source code can be audited by no one except its' developers, and open source code can be audited by anyone.
You're not the only one. It's one of my biggest reasons for staying away from it
What do you use instead?
LineageOS with microg
some of it is kind of inevitable when you see how far ahead from everyone else they are technically and when people shitting on their work just aren't at their (technical) level it seems to be very draining. and eventually lead to dramas.
GOS is a great project. This is a FUD campaign.
i might just fork grapheneos and rewrite everything.
Too be fair (not French but aware of their culture and government) the French are pretty smart, for people and don’t fuck around with serious issues. I bet you if they got access, it wouldn’t be long till issue a long warning before a ban if it were to cause harm to others.
The main reason why I decided not to use it, despite it being an obvious choice. But I'm also that kind of old dude that is not very receptive to drama... this may explain ;)