The guy could not use “Convection Roast” mode in his oven unless he connects to wi-fi and registers personal data. Apparently because this was a cook mode that was added after the oven was marketed.
Sure, it is useful to be able to get new features and upgrades after the thing is produced. But because of that, it’s as if they are making the store version deliberately excessively basic in order to twist people’s arms to run their proprietary closed-source spyware.
I was originally going to tag this as [a/d] (for asshole design), but opted to call it crappy design because upgradability is still a good thing. What’s crappy is the fact that:
it’s not FOSS
GE’s server is needlessly in the loop for everything
ppl must register on GE’s platform and give copious personal info which is then certain to be abused
To avoid both c/d and a/d, I would insist:
the app must be FOSS
the app and appliance both must have no cloud dependency and talk to each other in an off-grid LAN-only scenario
upgrades must be fetchable over Tor without registration, and side-loadable; users must be able to connect over Tor from a public cafe/library to fetch upgrades
evenwicht in iot @lemmy.sdf.org
🫕📱GE: Wi-Fi required to roast food in your high-end $3,600 oven
https://www.consumerreports.org/appliances/do-you-need-wifi-to-cook-a-roast-a9457457941/cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/47171718