Stop Killing Games is facing a complaint in the EU that uses nonsense logic to accuse the movement's founder of failing to disclose financial contributions he never made: 'It's not paranoia if they re
Yah, they seem very worried about the public groundswell.
Almost like it’s not just about allowing games to be run locally or a third party server being an annoyance. It’s almost like killing games was more part of a larger business strategy, like they were intentionally deleting products people payed for to force them to buy new versions, or move to more heavily monetized ones.
squirrel in ghazi
Stop Killing Games is facing a complaint in the EU that uses nonsense logic to accuse the movement's founder of failing to disclose financial contributions he never made: 'It's not paranoia if they re
https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/stop-killing-games-is-facing-a-complaint-in-the-eu-that-uses-nonsense-logic-to-accuse-the-movements-founder-of-failing-to-disclose-financial-contributions-he-never-made-its-not-paranoia-if-they-really-are-out-to-get-you/cross-posted from: https://endlesstalk.org/post/92155985
Yah, they seem very worried about the public groundswell.
Almost like it’s not just about allowing games to be run locally or a third party server being an annoyance. It’s almost like killing games was more part of a larger business strategy, like they were intentionally deleting products people payed for to force them to buy new versions, or move to more heavily monetized ones.