Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.
61
sp3ctr4l - 10mon
Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.
You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain 'straight' by the condition 'sufficiently kinky'.
44
daggermoon @lemmy.world - 10mon
OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?
10
sp3ctr4l - 10mon
I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.
So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?
17
daggermoon @lemmy.world - 10mon
I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.
2
gandalf_der_12te - 10mon
i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.
2
Pulptastic @midwest.social - 10mon
Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.
8
Shou @lemmy.world - 10mon
The human sexipede
1
phlegmy @sh.itjust.works - 10mon
I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?
14
whodatdair - 10mon
A risk I’m willing to take
15
ByteJunk @lemmy.world - 10mon
Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.
9
puppycat (she/her) - 10mon
for science!
3
djsoren19 - 10mon
Now this is science I can get behind! Let's get someone behind me!
2
Moose @moose.best - 10mon
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our top switch scientists researching this at once!
10
explodicle @sh.itjust.works - 10mon
Maybe we haven't heard of successful attempts because it's like when ants get stuck in a loop.
6
GooberEar @lemmy.wtf - 10mon
It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.
20
no banana - 10mon
Good question! I guess I'm the other guy. No way I would be the main character!
10
ZILtoid1991 @lemmy.world - 10mon
That's really rude! What if I'm having sex with a trans woman? That doesn't make her "the other guy", not even if she penetrates me with her gigantic girl cock that dwarfs mine.
A_Very_Big_Fan in 196
The other rule
Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.
Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.
You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain 'straight' by the condition 'sufficiently kinky'.
OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?
I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.
So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling
Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?
I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.
i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.
Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.
The human sexipede
I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?
A risk I’m willing to take
Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.
for science!
Now this is science I can get behind! Let's get someone behind me!
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our
topswitch scientists researching this at once!Maybe we haven't heard of successful attempts because it's like when ants get stuck in a loop.
It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.
Good question! I guess I'm the other guy. No way I would be the main character!
That's really rude! What if I'm having sex with a trans woman? That doesn't make her "the other guy", not even if she penetrates me with her gigantic girl cock that dwarfs mine.