from his feeder channel, but first comments suggest it's the essence of the thingy
Llituro [he/him, they/them] - 16hr
the majority of the coverage was about lander's complete failure to overcome his liberal zionism.
8
LeninWeave [none/use name, any] - 15hr
A liberal zionist in 2025 is functionally indistinguishable from a fascist, so I'm not sure why anyone expect Lander to overcome anything he hadn't already.
12
Llituro [he/him, they/them] - 14hr
it's just weird to me when people confuse a political commentator with no particular allegiance to an org or tendency to demonstrate principled vanguardism or something. i personally don't put any emotional value in bourgeois electoralism that isn't attached to a disciplined vanguard party, but that's my prerogative. on the gradations within electoral politics, lander has demonstrated a certain greater tendency towards humanitarianism than his opponent. i personally expect little of lander beyond probably voting somewhat progressively, probably voting against arming the zionist entity. but from the perspective of vanguardism, i'd rather be raising the class consciousness of a brad lander supporter than an active aipac ghoul supporter. for brad lander, it's obvious that he knows he's a fascist, when he gets grilled by more vicious zionists, he has no answers for them that sound reasonable. they're able to bash against the obvious contradictions of liberal zionism, like that he thinks "globalize the intifada" is somehow inciting violence against jewish people, but he refuses to condemn it. he's said that israel is committing a genocide, but he opposes BDS. if i'm in new york dsa, i'm asking myself why my org has no discipline and is willing to engage with these light social fascists.
6
plinky [he/him] - 8hr
hasan particular allegiance is to the democratic party, no? the point of this post. i mean, there is a spreading dipshittery around leftlibs with platners now landminer of lesser evilism, again. the exact shit usa left always does, they do it again.
3
Llituro [he/him, they/them] - 6hr
Not really, no? He engages with Democrats, but he's a large political commentator and that's what his audience is stuck on. He's shitting on the Dems for being useless, incompetent, and captured all the time.
2
plinky [he/him] - 3hr
does he engage with anyone else inside usa?
1
Llituro [he/him, they/them] - 3hr
not as much with PSL candidates that i personally would like, but definitely with people that are outside of the democratic party proper. it's also not like his coverage begins with, ends with, or is contingent upon electoralism within the democratic party? offering coverage of elections isn't the same as liberalism and reality-terminating democratic party terminalism, especially not in this godforsaken country where party membership isn't real and co-opting democratic seats on the ballot without mainstream party support is allowed.
3
Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them] - 16hr
Chat you be punished for calling me out. Don't make perfect the enemy of the good honey.
Just roll over dawg. I don't know what backroom deals went on. He'll vote for warbucks but he's more civil than what we have already.
plinky in slop
Yep, the boy gone, the dem is here to stay
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=iaPL99V484c
from his feeder channel, but first comments suggest it's the essence of the thingy
the majority of the coverage was about lander's complete failure to overcome his liberal zionism.
A liberal zionist in 2025 is functionally indistinguishable from a fascist, so I'm not sure why anyone expect Lander to overcome anything he hadn't already.
it's just weird to me when people confuse a political commentator with no particular allegiance to an org or tendency to demonstrate principled vanguardism or something. i personally don't put any emotional value in bourgeois electoralism that isn't attached to a disciplined vanguard party, but that's my prerogative. on the gradations within electoral politics, lander has demonstrated a certain greater tendency towards humanitarianism than his opponent. i personally expect little of lander beyond probably voting somewhat progressively, probably voting against arming the zionist entity. but from the perspective of vanguardism, i'd rather be raising the class consciousness of a brad lander supporter than an active aipac ghoul supporter. for brad lander, it's obvious that he knows he's a fascist, when he gets grilled by more vicious zionists, he has no answers for them that sound reasonable. they're able to bash against the obvious contradictions of liberal zionism, like that he thinks "globalize the intifada" is somehow inciting violence against jewish people, but he refuses to condemn it. he's said that israel is committing a genocide, but he opposes BDS. if i'm in new york dsa, i'm asking myself why my org has no discipline and is willing to engage with these light social fascists.
hasan particular allegiance is to the democratic party, no? the point of this post. i mean, there is a spreading dipshittery around leftlibs with platners now landminer of lesser evilism, again. the exact shit usa left always does, they do it again.
Not really, no? He engages with Democrats, but he's a large political commentator and that's what his audience is stuck on. He's shitting on the Dems for being useless, incompetent, and captured all the time.
does he engage with anyone else inside usa?
not as much with PSL candidates that i personally would like, but definitely with people that are outside of the democratic party proper. it's also not like his coverage begins with, ends with, or is contingent upon electoralism within the democratic party? offering coverage of elections isn't the same as
liberalism and reality-terminating democratic party terminalism, especially not in this godforsaken country where party membership isn't real and co-opting democratic seats on the ballot without mainstream party support is allowed.
Chat you be punished for calling me out.
Don't make perfect the enemy of the good honey.
Idk this guy just seems like if
ran for office.