43
3w
12

NUANCE! NUANCENUANCENUANCE! NUUUUUAAAAANNNNNCEEEEEEE

https://lemmy.ml/post/39578518?sort=Controversial
๐•†๐•”๐•ฆ๐•๐•š - 3w

Muh nooance, we gotta have a nooanced opinion about billionaires or else we're just as bad as them! I'M GONNA NOOOOANCE!

Amazing how despite probably lacking billionaire backing + feds, lemmitors will do the job for free. I've seen so much bill gates defense on here lol ๐Ÿ˜ญ

edit i almost missed this lmfao

hnbxP6P9MSwlR03.png

24
LeninWeave [none/use name, any] - 3w

https://lemmy.ml/post/39578518/22491017

lmao, when you know what "oligarchy" means.

Capitalism always lead to monopolies and a lack of competition. At some point one company will always get lucky and be able to use its money to completely destroy competition, especially small competition.

*Oligarchy always lead to monopolies and a lack of competition.

16
ClathrateG [none/use name] - 3w

N-n-nuance! hillgasm

13
dead [he/him] - 3w

Software wasn't even considered protected by copyright before 1976. Bill Gates essentially took advantage of an entirely new market. Compiled software binaries weren't protected by copyright until 1983.

13
Moidialectica [he/him, comrade/them] - 3w

Incredible nuance in the comments. Such as saying bill gates still would've been a monopoly even if a communist economy was established.

11
AntiOutsideAktion [he/him] - 3w

Pronounced "nuan-ceeee"

11
ZWQbpkzl [none/use name] - 3w

Whenever there is a broad consensus, some people will disagree just to find a way to feel smarter. Nuance fetishization, and both-sidesism is the laziest way to go about it.

9
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 3w

somebody please time-travel to 1976 so that they can use force to get bill gates to say that software is good and free. oh and this is also my 200th comment. seriously!

7
LadyCajAsca [she/her, comrade/them] - 3w

the libretion front against windows-cool niko-cocktail

4