i support the constitution, despite its flaws, and even the flaws about the founding fathers.
i support limited government within a socialist framework
i'm pretty sure there are revisionists here on hexbear which is fine - everyone has their own opinion, and some (including the people here) have their own taste of socialism/communism.
i do NOT condone the actions of stalin in any way, shape and form - between stalin and trotsky, i'd go with trotsky. he should've succeeded lenin in the 1920s to begin with.
Honestly I think they might just be ESL or ND? They come across as genuine but very naive and idealist. Reminds me of the politigram kids Joshua Cittarella wrote about.
8
LeninWeave [none/use name, any] - 2mon
It's the copy pasting and the answering with partial or non-answers that make me think it's a bit, but you might be right.
8
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i am being serious. do you want me to show my political quiz results?
2
Sickos [they/them, it/its] - 2mon
TAGLINE QUALITY BIT
9
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
again, i'm still being very serious. is it okay i can send my political quiz results?
2
stink @lemmygrad.ml - 2mon
I was here!
2
Sickos [they/them, it/its] - 2mon
16
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i support left-libertarianism, i find socialism to be very interesting and oppose stalin's actions.
I cannot tell if this is a bit or if you are real. It reads like one but you never know
16
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i'm being serious.
2
buckykat [none/use name] - 2mon
12
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i DON'T get it.
1
buckykat [none/use name] - 2mon
Stalin is good, amerikkka is bad, and I expect you to get yourself banned crashing out because you're a liberal soon.
5
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i assume you mean neoliberalism - if you can ask me, neoliberalism is a pretty wasteful thing. is there any reason why you called me a liberal?
1
buckykat [none/use name] - 2mon
Because you support the [US] constitution, and you do NOT condone the actions of Stalin in any way, shape, [or] form.
6
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
firstly, i think that if the us becomes a socialist nation, the constitution will have to be reformed, the government will have to be restructured to fit within a socialist framework, and a second bill of rights would be ratified.
secondly, the rules say 'Respect that people have differences of opinion and that every leftist has a place in our community - discussing differences in theory is fine and encouraged, just don't make it personal". it's fine if you're a stalinist - that said, what stalin did during his tenure is very inexcusable, gulags and all. if trotsky was given the job instead of stalin, he would've decentralized the soviet government completely. plus, there are democratic and libertarian forms of communism such as:
de leonism (a cross between marxism and syndicalism (named after daniel de leon) in which the government has a party-union framework, rather than party-state)
anarcho-communism (which emphasizes the 'stateless' part of communism)
council communism (in which a communist government consists of workers' councils)
left communism (any communist ideology that opposes stalinism)
i'm somewhere in the 'anti-stalinist left'.
and by the way, what are your thoughts on the us constitution?
1
buckykat [none/use name] - 2mon
The US constitution is a worthless rag penned by slavers, designed to forever protect the interests of rich landowners.
I believe Stalin only did two things wrong in his whole tenure: Not suppressing kkkristianity enough, and stopping at Berlin.
9
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
so do you think that the us constitution should be changed completely?
1
vanDerVaartBlackenedRanch [none/use name] - 2mon
Instead of relitigating ideological disputes that are nearing a hundred years old, what have you done with existing movements such as Food Not Bombs?
Where were you in summer 2020?
3
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i find 'food not bombs' to be very interesting. i also support blm because i strongly support equity.
i was in my bedroom, chilling.
1
alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns] - 2mon
Okay, whose turn is it to post a hardline ML party line and throw OP in the gulag?
11
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
context?
1
Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem] - 2mon
Why do you support the constitution of your country^[I am contractually obligated to point out that you didn't specify which country you're talking about; I know which country you're from only because there's exactly one country whose netizens rarely feel the need to specify which country they're from. I can only assume the "founding fathers" are not the Eidsvoll Men.]? If the current constitution has good parts then surely those could just be copied into a new constitution, right?
10
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i live in the united states - by 'the constitution', i mean the us constitution.
1
Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem] - 2mon
...But it's a minor point, anyways. I just want people who seem to have a mindset that centers their own country to challenge that mindset, to think internationally, right. But that discussion is out of the way now, anyways. The bigger point is, again, why do you support the US constitution? I ask because even back when I was a liberal, I still supported my countries of citizenship getting new constitutions; I considered it obvious that these types of documents left for a few centuries will become outdated, and found the apparent "worship" of the Norwegian and US Constitutions to be very perplexing.
8
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
well i think that if the us becomes a socialist nation (in one way or another), the constitution will have to be reformed, the government will have to be restructured to fit within a socialist framework (i was thinking of de leonism and council communism), and a second bill of rights would be ratified.
1
Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem] - 2mon
How does this differ from adopting a new constitution in practice?
5
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i think some socialists here in the us advocate for the us government to be reorganized to fit within a socialist framework.
1
Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem] - 2mon
That didn't really answer my question, but it seems like you might have issues with communication and social cues.
4
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i actually have autism. seriously.
2
plinky [he/him] - 2mon
cia infiltrates your country and starts shoveling weapons to local insurgents, wdyd?
you get sieged, and nice little men in free press in very fancy costumes promise that siege will be lifted if you just sell your nice resources to nice fancy men, no biggie, they know what they are doing and will bring prosperity for all?
after providing free education, nice fancy man invite your best specialists and artists with higher salaries, wdyd?
(for my suspicions, i do think some sort of ansyn bottom-up is likelier route inside the usa, cause porkies can't fight something they can't see, but be real about some other stuff inside whole ass countryand society)
8
FunkyStuff [he/him] - 2mon
In this situation I would support the rights of insurgents to not do bad things and I would emphasize the idea of unity and respect to frustrate the attempt at subversion.
4
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
by "ansyn", do you mean anarcho-syndicalism?
also, i live in the us. if the cia decides to have a coup against the us, the people would fight back. then the cia would get reformed when the people wins.
1
buckykat [none/use name] - 2mon
The son of a former CIA director became president of the US by a coup in 2000.
8
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i think the people should've fought back against george w. bush when he won in 2000.
1
Blakey [he/him] - 2mon
Okay, but they didn't and likely wouldn't if (when?) it happens again. "Should have" is not really useful, and the more to the point, your answer has already been shown to not work/be incorrect, because it has already happened and things didn't go the way you said they "should". The bourgeoisie "should" step down and let us do FALGSC. Chinese landlords "should" have surrendered their unfairly acquired hoards to the revolution. Things that "should" happen fail to happen all the time.
3
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 1mon
what are you talking about?
1
RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them] - 2mon
✍️
7
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i DON'T get it. is there any reason why you're posting this comment?
2
thelastaxolotl [he/him] - 2mon
Ok
6
Pieplup [they/them, comrade/them] - 1mon
I think you need to read some theory my guy
3
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 1mon
i'm actually non-binary, and i prefer gender-neutral and feminine terms. seriously!
Have you considered having your pronoun choices reflect that? People do take (mis)gendering seriously here, but it’s hard for people to get it right when your tags suggest that masculine terms are also fine.
3
Pieplup [they/them, comrade/them] - 1mon
my guy is definitely gender neutral in this instance. If you don't like it and feel uncomfortable with it that's fine but it's definitely a gender neutral term the way i'm using it.
Also genuien advice, if you don't want people using masc language youshould have a username without a masc name and not have any pronouns in your bio
1
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 1mon
"dylan" is a gender-neutral name. seriously!
1
Pieplup [they/them, comrade/them] - 1mon
ignoring this obvious cope, If whne most people think fo dylan they think of a guy it's not gender neutral. doesnt' matter how many people name their daughters dylan
1
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
that post was a part of me introducing myself here. if that post found you a bit uncomfortable, i apologize.
2
DylanMc6 [any, any] - 2mon
i am being serious here - i support left-libertarianism, i find socialism to be very interesting and oppose stalin's actions.
DylanMc6 in main
reminder!
may i remind you that as a left-libertarian:
Weird bit, but okay
it's NOT a bit - i am being very serious.
EXCELLENT bit.
i'm being very serious here.
INCREDIBLE bit.
Honestly I think they might just be ESL or ND? They come across as genuine but very naive and idealist. Reminds me of the politigram kids Joshua Cittarella wrote about.
It's the copy pasting and the answering with partial or non-answers that make me think it's a bit, but you might be right.
i am being serious. do you want me to show my political quiz results?
again, i'm still being very serious. is it okay i can send my political quiz results?
I was here!
i support left-libertarianism, i find socialism to be very interesting and oppose stalin's actions.
I cannot tell if this is a bit or if you are real. It reads like one but you never know
i'm being serious.
i DON'T get it.
Stalin is good, amerikkka is bad, and I expect you to get yourself banned crashing out because you're a liberal soon.
i assume you mean neoliberalism - if you can ask me, neoliberalism is a pretty wasteful thing. is there any reason why you called me a liberal?
Because you support the [US] constitution, and you do NOT condone the actions of Stalin in any way, shape, [or] form.
firstly, i think that if the us becomes a socialist nation, the constitution will have to be reformed, the government will have to be restructured to fit within a socialist framework, and a second bill of rights would be ratified.
secondly, the rules say 'Respect that people have differences of opinion and that every leftist has a place in our community - discussing differences in theory is fine and encouraged, just don't make it personal". it's fine if you're a stalinist - that said, what stalin did during his tenure is very inexcusable, gulags and all. if trotsky was given the job instead of stalin, he would've decentralized the soviet government completely. plus, there are democratic and libertarian forms of communism such as:
and by the way, what are your thoughts on the us constitution?
The US constitution is a worthless rag penned by slavers, designed to forever protect the interests of rich landowners.
I believe Stalin only did two things wrong in his whole tenure: Not suppressing kkkristianity enough, and stopping at Berlin.
so do you think that the us constitution should be changed completely?
Instead of relitigating ideological disputes that are nearing a hundred years old, what have you done with existing movements such as Food Not Bombs?
Where were you in summer 2020?
Okay, whose turn is it to post a hardline ML party line and throw OP in the gulag?
context?
Why do you support the constitution of your country^[I am contractually obligated to point out that you didn't specify which country you're talking about; I know which country you're from only because there's exactly one country whose netizens rarely feel the need to specify which country they're from. I can only assume the "founding fathers" are not the Eidsvoll Men.]? If the current constitution has good parts then surely those could just be copied into a new constitution, right?
...But it's a minor point, anyways. I just want people who seem to have a mindset that centers their own country to challenge that mindset, to think internationally, right. But that discussion is out of the way now, anyways. The bigger point is, again, why do you support the US constitution? I ask because even back when I was a liberal, I still supported my countries of citizenship getting new constitutions; I considered it obvious that these types of documents left for a few centuries will become outdated, and found the apparent "worship" of the Norwegian and US Constitutions to be very perplexing.
well i think that if the us becomes a socialist nation (in one way or another), the constitution will have to be reformed, the government will have to be restructured to fit within a socialist framework (i was thinking of de leonism and council communism), and a second bill of rights would be ratified.
How does this differ from adopting a new constitution in practice?
i think some socialists here in the us advocate for the us government to be reorganized to fit within a socialist framework.
That didn't really answer my question, but it seems like you might have issues with communication and social cues.
i actually have autism. seriously.
cia infiltrates your country and starts shoveling weapons to local insurgents, wdyd?
you get sieged, and nice little men in free press in very fancy costumes promise that siege will be lifted if you just sell your nice resources to nice fancy men, no biggie, they know what they are doing and will bring prosperity for all?
after providing free education, nice fancy man invite your best specialists and artists with higher salaries, wdyd?
(for my suspicions, i do think some sort of ansyn bottom-up is likelier route inside the usa, cause porkies can't fight something they can't see, but be real about some other stuff inside whole ass countryand society)
In this situation I would support the rights of insurgents to not do bad things and I would emphasize the idea of unity and respect to frustrate the attempt at subversion.
by "ansyn", do you mean anarcho-syndicalism?
also, i live in the us. if the cia decides to have a coup against the us, the people would fight back. then the cia would get reformed when the people wins.
The son of a former CIA director became president of the US by a coup in 2000.
i think the people should've fought back against george w. bush when he won in 2000.
Okay, but they didn't and likely wouldn't if (when?) it happens again. "Should have" is not really useful, and the more to the point, your answer has already been shown to not work/be incorrect, because it has already happened and things didn't go the way you said they "should". The bourgeoisie "should" step down and let us do FALGSC. Chinese landlords "should" have surrendered their unfairly acquired hoards to the revolution. Things that "should" happen fail to happen all the time.
what are you talking about?
✍️
i DON'T get it. is there any reason why you're posting this comment?
Ok
I think you need to read some theory my guy
i'm actually non-binary, and i prefer gender-neutral and feminine terms. seriously!
Have you considered having your pronoun choices reflect that? People do take (mis)gendering seriously here, but it’s hard for people to get it right when your tags suggest that masculine terms are also fine.
my guy is definitely gender neutral in this instance. If you don't like it and feel uncomfortable with it that's fine but it's definitely a gender neutral term the way i'm using it.
Also genuien advice, if you don't want people using masc language youshould have a username without a masc name and not have any pronouns in your bio
"dylan" is a gender-neutral name. seriously!
ignoring this obvious cope, If whne most people think fo dylan they think of a guy it's not gender neutral. doesnt' matter how many people name their daughters dylan
that post was a part of me introducing myself here. if that post found you a bit uncomfortable, i apologize.
i am being serious here - i support left-libertarianism, i find socialism to be very interesting and oppose stalin's actions.