They subsequently edited their own video to blur one of his two swastika tattoos, without any editorial note explaining what they are blurring and why. The 2nd partly obscured one is still partially visible, just to the left of blurring. That's basically an admission that they know exactly what they're doing there.
damn they must've combed through literally tens of thousands of ukrainian soldiers to find the one guy with the swastika tattoos...
15
sexywheat [none/use name] - 2mon
I posted this in a lib chat and everyone is strangely quiet about it 🤷
15
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 2mon
lol same reaction from some libs I know that I've sent it too, crickets
13
coolusername [none/use name] - 2mon
comments are turned off
14
EllenKelly [comrade/them] - 2mon
The National what exactly 🧐
10
D61 [any] - 2mon
TFW you're at the tattoo parlor trying to get a swastika but can't remember which way the ends are supposed to point so you just get two done just to be safe.
5
StillNoLeftLeft [none/use name, she/her] - 2mon
This is incredible.
And it's so obvious the media knows what they are doing. Just a few weeks ago there was a visual article in the national news of Finland about "the brave ukrainian troops and their tattoos" where they had carefully selected tattoos that can be framed as patriotic, about family values and fallen "comrades" or whatever. No mention whatsoever to any controversy that might exist.
For no reason at all they felt the need to do this article to stan on the not at all nazi particle-oozing ukrainian military. /s
Such clear examples of framing an issue and consent manufacturing in process.
5
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ - 2mon
Exactly, the fact that they went back to cover it up is a such a clear indication that they know exactly what they're doing there.
5
HexReplyBot [none/use name] - 2mon
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
yogthos in canada
CBC interviewed an Ukrainian soldier, and his tattoos may or may not come as a shock to you
https://hexbear.net/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmygrad.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F7d220581-06f7-41cb-8740-b5b4cbb5fd27.jpegThey subsequently edited their own video to blur one of his two swastika tattoos, without any editorial note explaining what they are blurring and why. The 2nd partly obscured one is still partially visible, just to the left of blurring. That's basically an admission that they know exactly what they're doing there.
https://youtu.be/uevoW6Z5LOE?t=38
damn they must've combed through literally tens of thousands of ukrainian soldiers to find the one guy with the swastika tattoos...
I posted this in a lib chat and everyone is strangely quiet about it 🤷
lol same reaction from some libs I know that I've sent it too, crickets
comments are turned off
The National what exactly 🧐
TFW you're at the tattoo parlor trying to get a swastika but can't remember which way the ends are supposed to point so you just get two done just to be safe.
This is incredible.
And it's so obvious the media knows what they are doing. Just a few weeks ago there was a visual article in the national news of Finland about "the brave ukrainian troops and their tattoos" where they had carefully selected tattoos that can be framed as patriotic, about family values and fallen "comrades" or whatever. No mention whatsoever to any controversy that might exist.
For no reason at all they felt the need to do this article to stan on the not at all nazi particle-oozing ukrainian military. /s
Such clear examples of framing an issue and consent manufacturing in process.
Exactly, the fact that they went back to cover it up is a such a clear indication that they know exactly what they're doing there.
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: