68
5mon
44

tankies are ruining the *checks notes* NATO

c o o k e d

Dort_Owl [they/them, any] - 5mon

Most coherent liberal

28
Thordros [he/him, comrade/them] - 5mon

Sorry, tankies, but opposing war is something Stalin—and by extension Hitler, because they are identical men—would do. And as Putin is Hitler, that means Putin is also Stalin, ipso facto you support World War 3.

very-intelligent

26
miz [any, any] - 5mon

"a standing ovation for an SS nazi is fine, just don't question the bourgeois line on the proxy war"

24
Fishroot [none/use name] - 5mon

The government has to apologize for that event after some zionist organization broke it (of course there were some left adjacent orgs that looked into it before hand but it was not taken seriously)

5
Fishroot [none/use name] - 5mon

i don't think the NDP needs Yve Engler to destroy the party, Singh doing entryism for the Liberals for years did that.

19
Edamamebean [she/her] - 5mon

Lmao these assholes are absolutely allergic to power. "No we can't have a leader that takes an actual radical stance! It'll kill the party you tankie! We have to keep being a more useless version of the liberals, that's doing great for the party" maybe-later-kiddo

18
MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him] - 5mon

putin is not far right

15
ethan_passerine [he/him] - 5mon

Putin is a reactionary autocrat who embodies the worst traits of State tyranny - nationalistic, militaristic, and hostile towards personal and workplace freedom - even if his oligarchic capitalism and Soviet nostalgia contradict a strict 'far-right' label.

8
miz [any, any] - 5mon

autocrat

"Putin has absolute personal power" and other lines favored by Anne Applebaum

10
ethan_passerine [he/him] - 5mon

Why yes, Putin is an autocrat, his highly personalized and centralized system of power lacks meaningful checks and balances. He suppresses dissent, and operates largely on his personal whims rather than any sort of institutional governance.

1
miz [any, any] - 5mon

seems like this is so subjective it can be applied to any government you don't like. I don't think you have any real evidence for it all being his personal whims beyond Applebaum-tier articles in The Atlantic. on a larger level, this is Great Man Theory bullshit with zero material analysis

8
Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them] - 5mon

My cat is autocratic when he decides that dinner time should be at 5 instead of 6.

3
Lemmygradwontallowme [he/him, comrade/them] - 5mon

Is he the shaytan al akbar however? Perhaps he's a shaytan al saghir, tho.

7
ethan_passerine [he/him] - 5mon

Opposing one tyranny by excusing another betrays the essence of liberation - solidarity fights all oppression, not just the West's. Revolutionary ethics demand consistency, selective outrage that shields authoritarianism under the guise of anti-imperialism is not how we should conduct ourselves.

3
miz [any, any] - 5mon

authoritarianism

gotta be my favorite way to dismiss any use of state power I don't agree with

13
ethan_passerine [he/him] - 5mon

Russia is deeply authoritarian, and built on the oppression of the people by the State and capital. What would you consider authoritarianism to be?

2
miz [any, any] - 5mon

so authoritarian is when capitalist state? that doesn't seem like a useful definition to me

7
ethan_passerine [he/him] - 5mon

I'm sorry that you find the word 'authoritarian' upsetting, however it does have a commonly agreed upon definition. I personally see no need to pretend otherwise.

1
ProletarianDictator [none/use name] - 5mon

What would you consider authoritarianism to be?

A meaningless, inconsistently applied word born out of a fetish for idealism that is primarily used to deem any state opposed to Western hegemony as irredeemable and worthy of condemnation.

4
yourebrainwashed @thelemmy.club - 5mon

Russia is definitely ruled by westerner lmao.

The weapon industry need enemies. Ever heard of the 90ies when America coup'ed russia and they starved for 10 years

3
m532 @lemmygrad.ml - 5mon

Authoritarianism is when sovereign and not ruled by westerners (according to the way imperialists use the word)

Its a good thing (for us, not for you)

2
yourebrainwashed @thelemmy.club - 5mon

Russia is literally ruled by westerners. Both in a colonial sense (Siberia is a colony), political (they're an oligarchy) and in the geopolitical one.

If their oligarchs don't create wars how else is Lockheed Martin supposed to sell missile?

Putin is literally the tsar.

2
m532 @lemmygrad.ml - 5mon

"Authoritarianism bad"

Imperialist detected. Are the pesky authoritarians putting up resistance to your world genocide again, instead of rolling over like you want them to?

3
IsThisLoss [comrade/them] - 5mon

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/ch06.htm

The same must be said of the revolutionary character of national movements in general. The unquestionably revolutionary character of the vast majority of national movements is as relative and peculiar as is the possible revolutionary character of certain particular national movements. The revolutionary character of a national movement under the conditions of imperialist oppression does not necessarily presuppose the existence of proletarian elements in the movement, the existence of a revolutionary or a republican programme of the movement, the existence of a democratic basis of the movement. The struggle that the Emir of Afghanistan is waging for the independence of Afghanistan is objectively a revolutionary struggle, despite the monarchist views of the Emir and his associates, for it weakens, disintegrates and undermines imperialism; whereas the struggle waged by such "desperate" democrats and "Socialists," "revolutionaries" and republicans as, for example, Kerensky and Tsereteli, Renaudel and Scheidemann, Chernov and Dan, Henderson and Clynes, during the imperialist war was a reactionary struggle, for its results was the embellishment, the strengthening, the victory, of imperialism.

1
yourebrainwashed @thelemmy.club - 5mon

Putin is allied with netanyahu

1
MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him] - 5mon

احا

1
yourebrainwashed @thelemmy.club - 5mon

Anyway i hope you're loved ones are ok friend. Free palestine

3
MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him] - 5mon

thanks

2
CommCat [none/use name] - 5mon

how long till libs in the NDP accuses Yves Engler of being Hamas?

14
Fishroot [none/use name] - 5mon

He got arrested last year for Palestinian activism when some nameless organization astrotuffed a smear campaign against him

15
Fishroot [none/use name] - 5mon

WASP looking ass woman

6
Infamousblt [any] - 5mon

Everyone I don't like is a tankie! kitty-cri-screm

13
Fishroot [none/use name] - 5mon

doing the bare minimum of Canada's claimed mission in upholding international law is being tankie/hamas

11
Infamousblt [any] - 5mon

International law is tankiescri

11
dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him] - 5mon

Singh already did the job of killing whatever little that was left of NDP after Mulcair but sure it's "tankies".

11
yourebrainwashed @thelemmy.club - 5mon

Guy in 1916: jee I don't wanna die in a trench

Obnoxious idiot: OMG wouldn'y that make you a tankie?

4