FlyORO... As an enabler of the SAF supply chain, the company offers flyers the flexibility to align their ESG targets per flight rather than be succumbed to fixed blend ratios and bulk commitments upfront.
Highlights an interesting quirk of how Sustainable Aviation Fuel SAF is rolling out. So, not every flight will use the same mix of fuel, some qill use SAF others assumedly won't? I wonder what the differences guiding those decisions are?
3
ikt - 2mon
I'm guessing it'll be based on profit margins of the flights themselves, QANTAS is more likely to use it because it has more expensive flights compared to Jetstar which has thinner margins
Cost of SAF: Even though the quantity of SAF available has increased in recent years, demand remains suppressed due to the higher cost of SAF compared to kerosene. The industry has to address this disparity and reduce the price gap with traditional fuel.
Yes, surely that'll be it. It'll be interesting to keep this detail in mind when they advertise emissions cuts to their fleets. I'll assume they'll use an 'average of CO2' per flight, but the emissions of each flight could vary greatly under the headline average.
Its an interesting location Toowoomba. I was wondering why they picked this location for the test. Turns out its probably pretty simple, Wagners is based in Toowoomba.
2
hanrahan - 2mon
What an oxymorin. Green washing at it's finest.
2
Gorgritch_Umie_Killa - 2mon
I mean, is it green washing? I once suggested to my partner we don't go on an overseas holiday we were considering a few years ago, and i got such an unexpectedly visceral scathing in tone reply "I'm not giving up overseas travel! No way!"
This is from a person who doesn't dismiss the science. It seems they don't, i believe, appreciate the enormity of the consequences of said scientific conclusions. If this is the reaction of someone like that, then i'm not sure we can 'stop flying' or even reduce flying. It seems a non-starter for the average Australian. So what other options are there in yhe time we have?
We could attempt to change hearts and minds, that could have an effect, i think the sustained no smoking campaigns prove that, but by the same token thats been hard graft. So there are technology solutions like this might be as well.
Gorgritch_umie_killa in environment
Wagner delivers Australia’s first dedicated Sustainable Aviation Fuel Blending Terminal : EcoVoice – Environment News Australia
https://www.ecovoice.com.au/wagner-delivers-australias-first-dedicated-sustainable-aviation-fuel-blending-terminal/Highlights an interesting quirk of how Sustainable Aviation Fuel SAF is rolling out. So, not every flight will use the same mix of fuel, some qill use SAF others assumedly won't? I wonder what the differences guiding those decisions are?
I'm guessing it'll be based on profit margins of the flights themselves, QANTAS is more likely to use it because it has more expensive flights compared to Jetstar which has thinner margins
https://www.airbus.com/en/innovation/energy-transition/our-commitment-to-saf/sustainable-aviation-fuels
Yes, surely that'll be it. It'll be interesting to keep this detail in mind when they advertise emissions cuts to their fleets. I'll assume they'll use an 'average of CO2' per flight, but the emissions of each flight could vary greatly under the headline average.
Its an interesting location Toowoomba. I was wondering why they picked this location for the test. Turns out its probably pretty simple, Wagners is based in Toowoomba.
What an oxymorin. Green washing at it's finest.
I mean, is it green washing? I once suggested to my partner we don't go on an overseas holiday we were considering a few years ago, and i got such an unexpectedly visceral scathing in tone reply "I'm not giving up overseas travel! No way!"
This is from a person who doesn't dismiss the science. It seems they don't, i believe, appreciate the enormity of the consequences of said scientific conclusions. If this is the reaction of someone like that, then i'm not sure we can 'stop flying' or even reduce flying. It seems a non-starter for the average Australian. So what other options are there in yhe time we have?
We could attempt to change hearts and minds, that could have an effect, i think the sustained no smoking campaigns prove that, but by the same token thats been hard graft. So there are technology solutions like this might be as well.